Thursday, May 28, 2026

The Prince, the President, and the Farmhand: Hollywood’s Missing Historical Epic

When we think of the Lewis and Clark expedition of 1804, we picture the ultimate American story: a desperate search for the Northwest Passage, mapping uncharted wilderness, and the expansion of a young nation.

​But when President Thomas Jefferson handed Meriwether Lewis his final instructions, he included a directive that sounds like it belongs in a fantasy novel. Jefferson, a man of the Enlightenment, instructed his explorers to look for a lost tribe of Native Americans who spoke Welsh. He even armed them with a list of Welsh vocabulary words to cross-reference with the tribes they encountered.

​To understand why a Founding Father was hunting for Welshmen in the American interior, we have to rewind the clock over six hundred years, leave the sun-dappled American frontier, and step into the cold, rain-slicked stone castles of 12th-century North Wales.

​The Bloody Summer of 1170

​Following the death of Owain Gwynedd, King of Gwynedd, the realm fractured. His sons immediately plunged the kingdom into a brutal, fratricidal civil war for the crown. According to legend, one of those sons, Prince Madoc, was utterly disgusted by the slaughter of his own family.

​Rather than fight his brothers, Madoc chose exile


 built a small fleet of ships and sailed west, directly into the terrifying and unmapped Atlantic Ocean. Months later, he returned to Wales with an impossible story. He claimed to have found a massive, fertile land across the western sea. He gathered ten more ships—filling them with men, women, and children seeking a peaceful life away from the bloodshed of Gwynedd—and sailed west a second time.

​Madoc and his fleet were never seen in Wales again.

​The Mystery of the Mandan

​For centuries, the story of Madoc was treated as a campfire myth. But by the 18th century, strange rumors began trickling back to the East Coast from French trappers and early frontiersmen. They spoke of a tribe along the Missouri River called the Mandan.

​The Mandan didn't fit the European assumptions of nomadic Plains tribes. They lived in permanent, heavily fortified towns made of earth and timber, laid out with deliberate civic planning featuring distinct streets and a central public plaza. Proponents of the Welsh theory argued this level of fixed, defensive civic engineering was a lingering echo of medieval European castle-building.

​But the visual centerpiece of the myth was how they navigated the treacherous Missouri River.




Frontiersmen noted the Mandan used "bull boats"—made by stretching a raw buffalo hide over a bowl-shaped frame of woven willow branches. Crucially, they were rowed exactly like a Welsh coracle, with a single paddle used in a figure-eight motion at the front of the boat. To a Welsh immigrant trapping in the Dakotas, seeing a Native American rowing a perfect replica of a River Towy coracle would have been a staggering sight.

​Rumors spread rapidly through London and Washington. Pamphlets claimed the Mandan word for bread sounded like bara, water like dwr, a valley like cwm, and a bluebird like glas. Later, when the famous 19th-century painter George Catlin lived among them, he was astonished to note that many Mandan had hazel or blue eyes, and that a significant portion of the tribe inherited a trait of naturally silvery-grey hair.

​The Farmhand Who Mapped the West

​This brings us to the most improbable footnote in American history. In 1792, a 22-year-old Welsh farmhand named John Evans left the small village of Waunfawr in Snowdonia and sailed to America with just $1.75 to his name. Funded by radical Welsh intellectuals, his sole mission was to find the Welsh Indians.

​He literally walked from the East Coast to St. Louis. After being briefly imprisoned as a British spy, he convinced the Spanish colonial government to fund his expedition up the Missouri River. Between 1795 and 1797, Evans endured a grueling 1,800-mile journey, surviving hostile encounters and brutal winters, finally reaching the Mandan villages in North Dakota.

​It was a crushing disappointment.

​Evans spent six months living among the Mandan and realized almost immediately they were entirely Native American. In 1797, a broken-hearted Evans wrote back to London: "In respect of the Welsh Indians, I have to inform you that there is no such people."

​He died of malaria in New Orleans shortly after, at just 29 years old. However, his journey was not a failure.




During his expedition, Evans produced a meticulously detailed map of roughly 700 miles of the Missouri River. That cartographic masterpiece made its way onto the desk of Thomas Jefferson. When Lewis and Clark set off in 1804, Jefferson gave them Evans's map. They relied on it so heavily they didn't even bother making their own primary maps of the lower Missouri River.

​The Welsh farmhand who went looking for a myth had ultimately drawn the literal roadmap for America's greatest expedition.

​The Movie We Aren't Getting (Yet)

​Hollywood is constantly searching for the next great historical epic, yet studios remain remarkably risk-averse, often shying away from purely European medieval histories.

​But the story of Madoc isn't just Welsh history—it is the ultimate American frontier mystery. Imagine a cinematic epic told across two timelines. In one, a gritty, panoramic survival thriller as Lewis and Clark navigate the dangers of the 1804 frontier, guided by a Welshman's map and a secret mandate from the President. In the other, Madoc’s 1170 AD fleet battles Atlantic storms and attempts to build a civilization from scratch in a primeval wilderness.

​It is Master and Commander meets The Revenant. It bridges the folklore of Wales with the birth of the United States. The story is sitting right there in the historical record, waiting for a filmmaker bold enough to set sail.

From Caerau to the Coast: The Slow Fade of Barry and the Crisis of Local Power


From Caerau to the Coast: The Slow Fade of Barry and the Crisis of Local Power

There was a specific kind of magic to a sunny weekend in the 1970s. The routine was always the same: Dad would pile us into the car, and we’d set off from Caerau, winding our way down toward the coast. To a child, that drive felt like an epic cross-country expedition, punctuated by the hum of the engine and the growing anticipation of the sea air.

Our destination, of course, was Barry.

Barry in it's hey day


In those days Barry was vibrant, chaotic, and utterly alive. It smelled of saltwater, hot chips, and the diesel of a working port. The holidaymakers from the valleys thronged the Island, the fairground lights flashed with promise, and the docks—while past their absolute coal-exporting peak—still felt like the industrial anchor of the town. It was a place that did things, made things, and welcomed the world.

Decades later, the view looks very different. The tide has gone out on Barry’s industrial might, and what it left behind is a familiar, frustrating story of modern British decline.

The Illusion of Regeneration

If you walk down by the Waterfront today, you’ll see the modern face of Barry: housing developments, a regional supermarket, and generic retail spaces. It looks polished on a glossy brochure. But look closer, and you realize it is regeneration without a soul—and more importantly, without economic teeth.

Barry has suffered from a chronic lack of new, high-value industry. We have successfully built houses for people to sleep in, but we haven’t built an economy for them to work in. The heavy industries of the past have vanished, replaced not by high-tech manufacturing or green energy hubs, but by low-wage retail and service jobs, or the requirement to commute out of the town entirely. It has transformed a proud, self-sufficient town into a commuter suburb.

The Powerlessness of the Local Council

Why is Barry stuck in this loop of stagnation? A massive part of the problem lies in how we are governed.

When you compare a Welsh town council to its counterparts across the Atlantic, the structural weakness of our system becomes glaringly obvious. In the United States, a city council or local municipality possesses massive, transformative powers:

  • Fiscal Autonomy: US cities can levy their own local sales taxes, issue municipal bonds to fund massive infrastructure projects, and create aggressive, localized tax incentives to lure major corporate employers.

  • Direct Execution: A US mayor or city manager has the executive power to cut through red tape, aggressively zoning areas for specific industrial growth and directly negotiating with global industries.

By contrast, Barry Town Council—and even the broader Vale of Glamorgan Council—is caught in a trap of centralisation. Our local authorities are largely administrative conveyor belts for decisions made under the tight purse strings of Cardiff Bay and Westminster.

The Systemic Trap: Local government in Wales relies overwhelmingly on central government grants. They have minimal power to raise independent revenue and virtually no leverage to attract global industry on their own terms.

When a town council's powers are restricted to managing local parks, allocating allotments, and commenting on planning applications that they ultimately don't control, it’s no wonder the pace of change feels glacial. They simply do not possess the statutory or financial weapons required to fight macroeconomic decline.

Moving Beyond Nostalgia

It is easy to get lost in the nostalgia of those 1970s drives from Caerau—to look back at Dad at the wheel and wish for a simpler era. But Barry doesn't need to become a museum piece or a backdrop for television sitcoms. It deserves a real economic future.

Until we radically decentralise power in Wales and give our coastal towns the actual financial authority and industrial mandate to reinvent themselves, places like Barry will remain stuck in limbo: wealthy in memories, but starved of opportunity.

Saturday, May 23, 2026

The Ghost of Pat Buchanan in the House of Lords: Why Maurice Glasman's 'Spectator' Interview Should Clear Your Eyes About Modern Politics


​The Ghost of Pat Buchanan in the House of Lords: Why Maurice Glasman's 'Spectator' Interview Should Clear Your Eyes About Modern Politics

​If you lived in the United States during the 1990s, political punditry had a distinct, combative soundtrack. At the center of it was often Pat Buchanan on The McLaughlin Group, unleashing a raspy, fire-and-brimstone populist pitch that felt radically out of step with the slick, centrist "End of History" consensus of the Clinton-Gingrich era. Buchanan spoke of a "culture war," fiercely opposed free-trade agreements like NAFTA, demanded hard borders, and treated the cosmopolitan, globalist elite with unadulterated contempt.

​To the mainstream media of the '90s, Buchananism was viewed as a dangerous, paleoconservative throwback.

​Fast forward thirty years. Switch on The Spectator’s YouTube channel and listen to the recent interviews with Lord Maurice Glasman—the academic, peer, and intellectual founder of "Blue Labour." As Glasman lambasts how "progressives killed Labour" and warns that a detached managerial elite has utterly abandoned the traditional working class, the hairs on the back of your neck might stand up.

​It is a bizarre, disturbing case of political time travel. A lifelong British socialist intellectual is playing the exact same political music that the godfather of the American Old Right composed decades ago.

​How did we get here?

​The Shattered Compass: Left-on-Economics, Right-on-Culture

​For generations, we have been told that politics is a simple, linear axis. The Left wants state intervention and social progressivism; the Right wants free markets and traditional values.

​But what happens when you slice that compass in half and stitch the opposing loose ends together? You get the populist twilight zone inhabited by both Buchanan and Glasman.